JK Rowling Sues EBay Over Auctions Selling Pirated Books

JK Rowling is suing eBay for allowing the sale of pirated ebook versions of her books from the Indian version of the auction site. An injunction was awarded in favor of Rowling prohibiting eBay from listing any illegal auctions. This requires eBay to police the auctions proactively instead of waiting for a notice from the rights holder of a copyright infringing sale. Via Times UK.

I certainly don’t condone any illegal sales of ebooks but I do wonder if JK Rowling could deter some illegal sales by authorizing legitimate e versions of her Potter books for sale. Clearly there is a segment of the market who would not only like such a thing but be willing to pay for it.


0 comments on “JK Rowling Sues EBay Over Auctions Selling Pirated Books

  1. I wonder why she has never done so? I admit to owning bootleg ebook copies of her books, though I’ve never read them and can’t for the life of me think of where I got them from, since Harry Potter wouldn’t be my first choice in downloading free reading material, which I tend to frown on anyhow, lol. I also bought and own all of the books in paper format, and I’ve never read those either. But if I’m ever going to read them, I’m much more likely to read them in electronic format, despite owning all of the paper copies. So you’re right, the market is there because i doubt I’m the only one.

  2. It could be the contract. Or maybe her publishers are afraid of pirated ebooks being more readily available if they release e-version of her books. It’s a big deal. If you look at http://weblog.ipcentral.info/archives/2007/02/the_growing_thr_1.html there are sites that offer eversion of print books for free. That’s just awful for everyone. It’s terrible that the writer loses sales, and it may very well mean her series or books will be dropped by her publisher. And it’s entirely different from buying used or library borrowing because in order for you to buy something used, someone had to buy it new once. But with illegal copies nobody has to buy it new at least once.

  3. While this lawsuit certainly is big news, the bigger story on eBay is the recent spate of hacker attacks by Romanian hacker, Vladuz, and the associated hundreds of thousands of scam listings and hijacked accounts (including those of eBay personnel) over the past week.

  4. I am pretty sure that I read that Rowling herself has nixed the ebook so if it is in the contract, it’s her idea. As for pirated ebooks being more readily available if they are released in ebook format, that’s just her publishers being a bit blind. Teleread.org reported that the ebook was created in under 12 hours of the release of the last Potter book. The fact that people are willing to BUY illegal copies tells me that Rowling is losing sales that she would have had if there were ebooks available.

    It is terrible for authors to lose sales based on illegal eversions which is why I am such a huge proponent of getting every one digitized. Obviously, not being put out in ebook form isn’t stopping anying from making eforms and exchanging them.

    Why not have a legitimate eform and sell it?

  5. Pingback: Online Auction Guides » Blog Archive » Auction Site - DIY robot ride up for auction

  6. Pingback: Dear Author.Com | eBay Injunction Reported Incorrectly

  7. It is Rowling and her own opinion why the books are not digitized and I have to agree with her. What you all are failing to understand is that real writers do not write for the money or for the fans, they write for themselves, fame and fortune is just a bonus. Writing is not a business, it is a passion. I too am an author, though no where near the level of Rowling, and whole-heartedly agree with her refusal to sell ebooks. There is so much more to writing, to having a completed manuscript bound and on a shelf. I do not expect anybody else to fully understand this sentiment but it is out there. Computers are a great thing, but some things are just better left to the old ways.

  8. Ebay, is having tough time and is facing litigation from round the corners of the world on almost same contentious issues. Similar complaints have been filed by Tiffany in New York and Christian Dior Couture in Paris, and top of it in Delhi High Court by JK Rowling (author of world famous Harry Potter collections). The Delhi High Court by reaffirming the injunction order dated November 16, 2004 on January 24, 2007 has instead of tying the loose ends has led to controversial issues on interpretation. Justice Sikri by making the order absolute against the defendants until conclusion of the proceedings sends out the signal that law will take its recourse. So any order passed by the Delhi High Court could set a precedent. The result of the said litigations has compelled eBay to take measures to prevent sale of e-books or pirated versions.What makes this case all the more interesting is that it really demonstrates the phenomenal challenge of policing the digital world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s